Chicago

Alderman Reilly: Grant Park to Remain Forever Open, Clear and Free

This is a discussion on Alderman Reilly: Grant Park to Remain Forever Open, Clear and Free within the Windy City Chat forums, part of the Windy City Forums category; News from Brendan Reilly Alderman of Chicago’s 42nd Ward FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Tuesday, September 18, 2007 FOR MORE INFORMATION Contact: ...


Go Back   Windy City Chat - All about Chicago, the Windy City! > Windy City Forums > Windy City Chat

Register Blogs FAQ Chat Room Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Click here to register

Reply

 

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old September 18th, 2007
Eric Frost
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Alderman Reilly: Grant Park to Remain Forever Open, Clear and Free

News from Brendan Reilly
Alderman of Chicago’s 42nd Ward

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Tuesday, September 18, 2007

FOR MORE INFORMATION
Contact: Alderman Reilly
(312) 744-3062

Alderman Reilly: Grant Park to Remain Forever Open, Clear and Free
Allowing Children’s Museum to Build in Grant Park Would Set Dangerous Precedent

Chicago - Alderman Brendan Reilly (42nd Ward) today announced his opposition to a proposal by the Chicago Children’s Museum to build a new 100,000 square-foot facility in Grant Park. Reilly made his announcement following a three-month public process structured to allow the Children’s Museum to present their plans and to facilitate public input. Recognizing that Grant Park belongs to the residents of the city of Chicago, Alderman Reilly acknowledged that his decision impacts the entire city of Chicago and not just neighborhood residents or his downtown constituents.

Grant Park belongs to all residents of Chicago and, thanks to Montgomery Ward’s vigilance, Grant Park has remained protected open-space for 171 years and is now one of our city’s most precious public assets, Reilly said. There is only one Grant Park and it should remain forever open, clear and free for future generations, from every corner of Chicago, to enjoy for many years to come.

Over the past three months, Alderman Reilly immersed himself in the history behind the long and tumultuous battle to protect Grant Park from buildings and obstructions. Reilly read books regarding the history of the park and spent time researching the four Illinois Supreme Court decisions that conferred special protections on Grant Park as public land. Those court decisions - commonly referred to as the Montgomery Ward decisions affirmed the 1836 decree that designated Grant Park as Public Ground - a Common to Remain Forever Open, Clear and Free of any Buildings, or other Obstruction Whatever.

During this process, I dedicated a significant amount of time to studying the 171-year history behind Grant Park, because I know that it is one of Chicago’s most precious resources. Many people may not be aware of the fact that the Chicago Children’s Museum is not the first worthy organization to pursue a facility in Grant Park. Over the past 150 years, dozens of exciting projects have been proposed for Grant Park. If exceptions had been allowed for those worthy projects, we would not be having this debate today because there would be no open space left on Grant Park.

My position on this issue has nothing to do with the merits of the Chicago Children’s Museum or the designs for their proposed facility. This debate is really about the future of Grant Park and whether or not it would be prudent to abandon 171 years of history that has preserved this open space as a park for all residents of the city of Chicago, Reilly said. I believe that supporting the Children’s Museum proposal to build on Grant Park would set dangerous precedent that would open the flood-gates for other entities to lobby for their own locations on Grant Park. I agreed with the Chicago Tribune’s recent editorial against new building in Grant Park when they opined ‘saying no to a Children’s Museum today empowers Chicago to keep saying no for eons of tomorrows.’

Alderman Reilly made it clear that, although he cannot support efforts to build new structures in Grant Park, he is a strong supporter of the Chicago Children’s Museum and that he is eager to work with museum officials to help the institution identify alternate locations that will allow the museum to expand. Reilly indicated that he is willing to host a meeting between the Children’s Museum and their current landlord, Navy Pier, to facilitate an expansion at their current location.

It is my understanding that the Children’s Museum is seeking to leave Navy Pier because they have outgrown their current facility and desperately need to expand, Reilly said. I am happy to help the Museum negotiate an expansion with Navy Pier because I think the Pier and the Museum have a mutually beneficial relationship. Navy Pier is the number one tourist destination in Illinois and, I believe, that has a lot to do with the Chicago Children’s Museum being located on the Pier. If a Navy Pier expansion does not work, I would support the Museum in considering other, unprotected downtown open-space such as Northerly Island or the Museum Campus.

According to Reilly, he is prepared take whatever steps are necessary to preserve and protect Grant Park from the Children’s Museum proposal and any future building proposals.

Just as Montgomery Ward fought to protect Grant Park for our generation, I believe it is our generation’s responsibility to honor that legacy by working to protect Grant Park for the benefit of future generations to come for all Chicagoans from every corner of the city, Reilly said. I will not bow to political pressure in this effort, because I refuse to ignore Grant Park’s 171 years of history as a specially protected open space. Back in his day, Montgomery Ward incurred the wrath of an angry Chicago City Council that claimed his fight to preserve public open space and to protect Grant Park was impeding economic progress for the city of Chicago. In fact, one alderman - Alderman William Ballard went so far as to say the downtown lakefront is no place for a park it should be used to bring revenue to the city. Thankfully, the Illinois Supreme Court disagreed with Alderman Ballard and now more than a century later, the people of Chicago are still able to enjoy the beautiful open space that is our beloved Grant Park our most precious asset.

Alderman Reilly encouraged the public to read a brief passage written about Grant Park by world-renowned architect and Chicagoan, Daniel Burnham, the author of the Plan for Chicago:

The lakefront by right belongs to the people. It affords their one great unobstructed view, stretching away to the horizon, where water and clouds seem to meet Not a foot of its shores should be appropriated by individuals to the exclusion of the people. On the contrary, everything possible should be done to enhance its natural beauties, thus fitting it for the part it has to play in the life of the whole city. It should be made so alluring that it will become the fixed habit of the people to seek its restful presence at every opportunity. - Daniel Burnham, 1909.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old September 18th, 2007
Eric Frost
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Original Word Doc

Here is the press release in Word format attached
Attached Files
File Type: doc GrantParkDecision_PressRls1-1.doc (33.5 KB, 0 views)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
alderman, clear, forever, free, grant, open, park, reilly, remain


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0

Visitor Map



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475